Stem cell research essay explores the development of organism from embryonic cells. The stem cell research essay may also discuss some of the ethical and the practical controversial issues in stem cell research. This been a relatively new field of study, stem cell research essay may attract the attention of scientist, the moralists, politicians and the entire public. This is because stem cell research has promising prospects in terms of developing cure for some terminal disease but the notion of creating organisms or human organ in a lab is very scarcely especially with very little known practical example of its success or failures. The raging debate on the effectiveness and the practical application of stem cell research requires that the population be more informed of the current progress to allow them make an informed contribution in the process. It would be equally unfair to stop the process without plausible reasons and miss the opportunity that behold, as it is unfair to adopt technology which take years to eliminate such as the nuclear weaponry.
The critical players in stem cell research have shrouded the issue in mystery leaving out majority of the global citizens to in the dark about the ongoing studies and previous outcomes. Thus stem cell research essay should demystify the subject. Since, like the nuclear technology, it can be wished off, it would be prudent for the involved partied in the stem cell research to act with speed and put in checks and balances to ensure that the knowledge is not an exclusive of few neither is it manipulated by the majority to dominate vulnerable groups. The first step towards seeking world wide consensus on the issue of stem cell research should be demystifying the skills and techniques used in this process through expository writing of stem cell research essay.
Stem Cell Research example
In her article Stem Cells: A Bioethical Balancing Act, Lisa Cahill, out rightly acknowledges the noble function of medical science (Park 2009). This was used in helping to alleviate ailments like Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, and spinal cord. This raises a lot of questions.
In supporting her thesis, Lisa answered the above prime questions. She argues that it can never be right to achieve any good by furthering evils. She goes on to lament on the morality of the people.
On the other hand Alice Park in her article “Stem-Cell Research,” takes a practical approach on the stimulating factors to the stem-cell research (Park 2009). She underscores the life of Dr. Douglas Melton. Her approach is essentially one driven by circumstance. She argues that nothing can drive innovation (Park 2009). In Melton’s case, his son Sam’s diagnosis of type 1 diabetes and later his daughter Emma’s diagnosis of the same disease prompted him to pursue a solution. Gills wife supported the view as a positive step in the advance of his profession and career development.
Coupled with the drawbacks labeled against stem cells, Alice goes further to explain how scientists across the globe endeavored for a breakthrough and Melton was not left out. In 2004, he created more than 70 embryonic-stem-cell lines using private funding and distributed free copies of the cells to researchers around the world. In October 2008, in furthering Yamanaka’s invention, Melton’s team made human iPS cells by replacing two of the four genes, known to cause cancer, with chemicals.
In conflict to the basic social justice, Melton is portrayed in the article as one who only considered the problems in his life and would do anything even to the extent of sacrificing embryos as the cure to his children’s diabetes. This Lisa attributes to individualism and extreme trust in technology where power resulted from the possession of money. This is unacceptable.